Uh Oh: TSA Not Just in Airports Anymore

tsasecurity

The TSA’s Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response (VIPR) teams will keep coming to a football game near you. In 2012, the TSA executed “more than 8,800″ surprise searches and checkpoints outside of airports. The number of these VIPR teams has increased since the program’s creation in 2005, and the program’s budget keeps on growing. The New York Times reports:

With little fanfare, the agency best known for airport screenings has vastly expanded its reach to sporting events, music festivals, rodeos, highway weigh stations and train terminals. Not everyone is happy. …


T.S.A. and local law enforcement officials say the teams are a critical component of the nation’s counterterrorism efforts, but some members of Congress, auditors at the Department of Homeland Security and civil liberties groups are sounding alarms. … “Our mandate is to provide security and counterterrorism operations for all high-risk transportation targets, not just airports and aviation,” said John S. Pistole, the administrator of the agency. “The VIPR teams are a big part of that.”


Some in Congress, however, say the T.S.A. has not demonstrated that the teams are effective. Auditors at the Department of Homeland Security are asking questions about whether the teams are properly trained and deployed based on actual security threats.


Civil liberties groups say that the VIPR teams have little to do with the agency’s original mission to provide security screenings at airports and that in some cases their actions amount to warrantless searches in violation of constitutional protections.


“The problem with T.S.A. stopping and searching people in public places outside the airport is that there are no real legal standards, or probable cause,” said Khaliah Barnes, administrative law counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. “It’s something that is easily abused because the reason that they are conducting the stops is shrouded in secrecy.”


T.S.A. officials respond that the random searches are “special needs” or “administrative searches” that are exempt from probable cause because they further the government’s need to prevent terrorist attacks.

So in today’s uplifting news, the TSA will continue working in conjunction with local law enforcement agencies to conduct searches without probable cause outside airports too. So much for Fourth Amendment protections.

Skyler Mann

Skyler Mann is a founding member and Managing Editor at Pocket Full of Liberty. She has her BA in philosophy and works in the insurance industry, moonlighting as a political pundit. She is a self-described small-l libertarian and an advocate for pragmatism -- one's political principles do not always align with what is feasible. She's a red fish in a blue sea, residing in Wilton, CT with her son and Mr, and has a Don't Tread On Me bumper sticker on her car. Follow her on Twitter: @sevenlayercake

4 Comments

  1. Lawful Plunder said:

    Once you break the link between searches and probable cause, you open the door to moving from limited govt. and legitimate police action, to overbearing govt. and a police state.

    “T.S.A. officials respond that the random searches are “special needs” or “administrative searches” that are exempt from probable cause because they further the government’s need to prevent terrorist attacks.”

    I think this quote gives the game away, because it’s completely open-ended. There’s no limiting factor whatsoever; It invites the govt to conduct searches at any event/transportation venue etc…anytime..anywhere. It’s stop and frisk for the masses with the justification of “preventing terrorism”.

    Mission creep, lack of accountability, the unintended consequences of precedent…. this story embodies all the problems with govt.

    “So much for Fourth Amendment protections.” ….Amen.

  2. drklrdbill said:

    You get searched and frisked at most major sporting events and the biggest music festivals now anyway. But, I have no idea why the TSA is getting involved.

    • S. R. Mann said:

      Seems like an unnecessary government expenditure. As you point out, private security firms have been doing this for various venues (successfully) for eons now. What’s of interest to me is how the TSA is not bound by reasonable cause when conducting searches. If their presence becomes more widespread, what consequences does this have on law enforcement as a whole? And so on and so forth.

  3. Lawful Plunder said:

    “Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response” Really? You come up with a ridiculous sounding name just so you can use the “menacing” sounding VIPR acronym. You’re a fucking TSA worker, get over yourselves.

*

*

Top